Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.elizadeuniversity.edu.ng/jspui/handle/20.500.12398/974
Title: Evolution of female promiscuity in Passerides songbirds
Authors: Lifjeld, Jan T.
Gohli, Jostein
Albrecht, Tomáš
Garcia-del-Rey, Eduardo
Johannessen, Lars Erik
Kleven, Oddmund
Mark, Petter Z.
Omotoriogun, Taiwo C.
Rowe, Melissah
Johnsen, Arild
Keywords: Extrapair paternity,
Life history,
Mating system,
Pair bond,
Parental care,
Sexual selection
Issue Date: 14-Aug-2019
Publisher: BMC Ecology and Evolution
Citation: ifjeld, J.T., Gohli, J., Albrecht, T. et al. Evolution of female promiscuity in Passerides songbirds. BMC Evol Biol 19, 169 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-019-1493-1
Abstract: Background: Female promiscuity is highly variable among birds, and particularly among songbirds. Comparative work has identified several patterns of covariation with social, sexual, ecological and life history traits. However, it is unclear whether these patterns reflect causes or consequences of female promiscuity, or if they are byproducts of some unknown evolutionary drivers. Moreover, factors that explain promiscuity at the deep nodes in the phylogenetic tree may be different from those important at the tips, i.e. among closely related species. Here we examine the relationships between female promiscuity and a broad set of predictor variables in a comprehensive data set (N = 202 species) of Passerides songbirds, which is a highly diversified infraorder of the Passeriformes exhibiting significant variation in female promiscuity. Results: Female promiscuity was highly variable in all major clades of the Passerides phylogeny and also among closely related species. We found several significant associations with female promiscuity, albeit with fairly small effect sizes (all R2 ≤ 0.08). More promiscuous species had: 1) less male parental care, particularly during the early stages of the nesting cycle (nest building and incubation), 2) more short-term pair bonds, 3) greater degree of sexual dichromatism, primarily because females were drabber, 4) more migratory behaviour, and 5) stronger premating sexual selection. In a multivariate model, however, the effect of sexual selection disappeared, while the other four variables showed additive effects and together explained about 16% of the total variance in female promiscuity. Female promiscuity showed no relationship with body size, life history variation, latitude or cooperative breeding. Conclusions: We found that multiple traits were associated with female promiscuity, but these associations were generally weak. Some traits, such as reduced parental care in males and more cryptic plumage in females, might even be responses to, rather than causes of, variation in female promiscuity. Hence, the high variation in female promiscuity among Passerides species remains enigmatic. Female promiscuity seems to be a rapidly evolving trait that often diverges between species with similar ecologies and breeding systems. A future challenge is therefore to understand what drives within-lineage variation in female promiscuity over microevolutionary time scales.
Description: Staff Publication
URI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-019-1493-1
http://repository.elizadeuniversity.edu.ng/jspui/handle/20.500.12398/974
Appears in Collections:Research Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Lifjeld2019_Article_EvolutionOfFemalePromiscuityIn.pdf1.66 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in EUSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.